Talk:Sidama people

Untitled

According to what I've heard the Amharas and the Sidamas have historically not gotten along, though I'm far from an expert on this subject, so I don't feel confortable adding anything to this article about this yet.

Gringo300 15:25, 6 August 2005 (UTC)

Good article 196.188.244.106 (talk) 15:26, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

Copyright violation

An anonymous user added a large amount of text from various articles at http://www.sidamaconcern.com. For future reference, running a Google search on the text in question did not result in links to that website. (The editor in question had posted the link, so that's how I found it.) -- Gyrofrog (talk) 19:13, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

People lets be neutral for the sake of public information. There is university in sidama zone (debub university)and I personaly know a lot of female graduates. Sidama people wasn't that oppresed during feudal regim. Lets not reflect and copy paste political reflection. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 128.214.205.62 (talk • contribs) 12:16, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Sources

It is a positive thing that an anon editor added references for a number of statements, but furnishing only the stub of a Harvard citation does not help very much -- are "S. Y. Hameso, Trevor Trueman, Temesgen M. Erena 1997" & "P. Bruno Maccani 1989" books, articles, or even more of an ephemeral medium??? -- llywrch 04:25, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://sidamachronicle.blogspot.com/2007/11/sidama-overview-of-history-culture-and.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Gyrofrog (talk) 17:45, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sidama people. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081120014025/http://www.csa.gov.et/surveys/Population%20and%20Housing%20Census%201994/survey0/data/docs%5Creport%5CAnalytical_Report%5CK07_ana.pdf to http://www.csa.gov.et/surveys/Population%20and%20Housing%20Census%201994/survey0/data/docs%5Creport%5CAnalytical_Report%5CK07_ana.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:51, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

3,7% free of any fancy believing?

The sum of the % of abramitic religions believers is unfortunately 81,4% which, added with the 'traditional believing' is 14,9, total 96,3%. What about the clever 3,7% NOT CITED? Are they free from insane fantasies? GianMarco Tavazzani (talk) 03:31, 25 August 2021 (UTC)