Talk:Sic et Non

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Sigehelmus in topic 14 years later

[Untitled] edit

I thought that "sic" means "thus."205.188.116.135 01:50, 9 January 2006 (UTC)LestradeReply

It does. But since Latin pretty much lacks an easy way to say "yes", "sic" also serves as so, thus, that is so, that is right or yes, as the need arises. - Nunh-huh 02:17, 9 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

The page sorely lacks a link to any text of this work. I encourage any amateur translater to please post your work and link to it through wikipedia..128.208.36.173 21:05, 3 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Please also see Wikisource. -- Stbalbach 13:21, 4 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

I believe the Latin exists in full but as far I have searched, all translations are commercial. What was the date of publication 1120? Surely a fair English translation exists. Can we get scans of one of the manuscripts? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Markbeaulieu (talkcontribs) 14:27, 23 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

14 years later edit

Since a request was made to a see a full English translation of this text, and still nothing. Shameful. Why is a 900 year old thesis copyrighted?--~Sıgehelmus♗(Tøk) 21:28, 24 September 2020 (UTC)Reply