NPOV

edit

Untitled

edit

Hmm... it may just be me, but this article doesn't seem very NPOV, reading more like a promotional sales pitch. -Tyr

Hmm. Not really. I assume you mean bits like this:
one of the most important and influential psychedelic downtempo or Psybient music projects of recent years .... made a huge impact ... considered by many to be among the most important.
Well, the thing is, that's basically true. If you are into the "psyambient" scene then Shpongle are definitely amongst, if not THE, more important and influential artists. However I am completely at a loss as to how I can back this up. I mean... if I found a newspaper article saying so, would that really be any greater proof than my current statement based on the consensus of years of speaking to followers of this area of music, both in person and online? It's a tough one. I suppose their sales figures are probably much higher than others but I have no firm facts on that either. I remember reading "Tales" sold over 50,000 or something like that (which might not sound much, but for such 'minority' music with no major label support, no radio play, no MTV, no media coverage, is pretty damn impressive). And I would strongly suspect that "copycat" artists like Entheogenic have got nowhere near that. But, since I can't remember the exact number I read for Tales, nor where I read it, nor have any evidence about Entheogenic's sales, that doesnt really help either. Stevekeiretsu 00:30, 3 October 2006 (UTC)Reply
Posford's "Twisted" is without any doubt at the very top of psy trance sales with 50,000 copies. 'Are You Shpongled' sold 30,000 copies without any promotion at all as a subgenre of a genre where a couple of thousand sales worldwide is a massive sucess. The preview gigs worldwide have been among the biggest parties going and usually sell out. Shpongle have 28,774 fans on last.fm while Ott has 5,449, Younger Brother have 5,232 and Entheogenic have 5,053. The "psychill" tag puts Shpongle above the next two artists combined. Turkeyphant 19:32, 10 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Dave Gilmour

edit

i have heard that some or another shpongle album features Dave Gilmour on guitar. is it true? which one?

There's an Alan Parsons album where one of the tracks (Return To Tunguska) was done with Shpongle and David Gilmour

  • simon posford does all the guitars on their albums if i am not mistaking.

Pete Callard plays the flamenco and jazz guitars, and does the solos.

I came here to ask where this sort of info would fit into the article, and whether a citation of album credits would be adequate verification. Downstrike (talk) 07:50, 28 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Meaning of "Shpongle"

edit

I'm curious what the name Shpongle means or how the name came about. I also want to know exactly how to pronounce it. Jeff

I don’t know what it means (probably nothing), but I do know how to pronounce it, so I’ve added an IPA transliteration for your benefit. By the way, TO ALL EDITORS: Please sign your comments on talk pages and in other discussion fora with four tildes (4×~). Raifʻhār Doremítzwr 09:52, 21 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Shpongle or "spongle" is an english slang for beeing high on drugs.

No, not really, at least imho - I'm english and I've never heard it used in that sense except by people aware of / implicitly paying homage to the band. Stevekeiretsu 00:30, 3 October 2006 (UTC)Reply
People will frequently say that they are "sphongled", "spangled" or just plain "mashed". It's all one and the same thing. There is an anecdote where Raja Ram was supposed to have said, "I'm feeling shpongled" while tripping heavily. Turkeyphant 19:06, 10 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

"Shpongle" Is the finish password for the Playstation 2 game "Top Gun". These guys did not just come up with the name.-DARK-67.149.1.41 (talk) 10:40, 29 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

It looks to me like the game you are referring to came out in 2001, at least 3 years after Shpongle released their first album, so the game is actually making a reference to the band. Possibly fans on the programming team. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lj solstone (talkcontribs) 23:07, 25 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

removal of link spam

edit

i have checked out the external links on this article. Following the links to last.fm and musicbrainz gives me the impression this is simply link spam. The shpongle pages on last.fm and musicbrainz do not offer ANY additional information that is not already present in the article. i would also consider discogs for deletion as all it offers in addition is a long discography. discogs is a well know resource, so that if someone really wants detailed information on discograhpies they already know how to get to the discogs website. I don't think we need last.fm and musicbrainz and discogs links on EVERY musican's and band's articles. NoMass 13:37, 16 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

File:Simon Posford of Shpongle.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

edit
  An image used in this article, File:Simon Posford of Shpongle.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:11, 3 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Simon Posford of Shpongle.gif Nominated for speedy Deletion

edit
  An image used in this article, File:Simon Posford of Shpongle.gif, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Other speedy deletions
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 17:08, 7 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Untitled fifth album

edit

The citation for the Untitled fifth album being released in 2013 simply links to a last.fm page involving an early 2011 concert. I can see no mention of an album being released in 2013, and the page in fact claims that the album is "slated for 2012 release". Does anybody have any further information on this album? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Core1911 (talkcontribs) 14:21, 23 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Shpongle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:47, 17 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Infobox image problem

edit

  Suggestion The infobox currently contains an image that is a photograph taken in a club, showing the artist in front of a big projection screen. The screen displays a middle aged man with a mustache. The man on the projection is so large and in the center of the image, that it's currently (too) easy to confuse the man for the artist, particularly on certain computer screens. I suggest cropping the image, so the artist is at its center. --143.176.30.65 (talk) 14:28, 12 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:22, 21 December 2022 (UTC)Reply