Talk:Showgirl: Homecoming Live/GA1
Latest comment: 10 months ago by Grnrchst in topic GA Review
GA Review edit
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Grnrchst (talk · contribs) 08:41, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Lead edit
"singer and songwriter"
Could be contracted to singer-songwriter
- Done
- Was it also released internationally by Parlophone? Or did Parlophone only release it in the UK?
- Done added EMI which released it internationally
Background edit
- Frontier Touring Company is cited a couple times in this section. As this company is non-independent source, it would be ideal if you could find alternative sources for the information it's cited to.
- Done replaced
- Remove the Amazon sales page for the album. The information it's cited to is already sourced from a more clearly reliable source, so there's no need.
- Done removed
Reception edit
- MSN Music should be in italics.
- Done
Commercial performance edit
- No notes
Track listing edit
- No notes
Personnel edit
- Maybe provide a link to liner notes for clarity.
- Done
Charts edit
- Think this section and the "Commercial performance" section could be merged, as they're depicting more or less the same thing in different forms.
Certifications edit
- No notes
Release history edit
- Table formatting has an error, so there's no bottom line for the "Format", "Label" and "Ref" columns. This needs fixing.
Checklist edit
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a. (reference section):
- References should be gone over in order to make sure they're fully cited, not missing dates of publication, authors, etc.
- b. (citations to reliable sources):
There's a couple instances of non-independent sources, from the touring company and a sales page for the album, in the Background section.
- c. (OR):
- Spotchecked most of the direct quotes and they're all verified.
- d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
- Earwig only flags the direct and attributed quotes.
- a. (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a. (major aspects):
- Perhaps it could do with a bit more about the concert itself.
- b. (focused):
- a. (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- Last revert was in 2007.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
- Album cover is fair use, photo of the concert is licensed under CC 4.0.
- b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Alt text aught to be provided for the images.
- a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/fail:
Holding for now, as a couple of the sources in the Background section are bugging me. Aside from that,this is a very well put-together article that I think could quite easily be passed.
- Pass/fail: