Talk:Shine Ya Light/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 09:32, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

Good Article review progress box Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Reunited once again for this review! --K. Peake 09:32, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

Infobox and lead

• Why is no length in the infobox when the album track list shows one?
• "from the album and serviced" → "from the album, serviced"
• "It entered the record charts" → ""Shine Ya Light" entered the top 40 of the record charts" starting a new para at this point
• "and the United Kingdom" → "and the UK"
• "in the UK." → "in the third country."
• "the singer performed the song live at" → "the singer performed it live at"
• Add in 2012 at the end of this sentence to be specific

Background and composition

• Pipe mastering to Mastering (audio)
• Pipe mixing to Audio mixing (recorded music)
• "for its programming" → "for the programming"
• Pipe recording engineers to Audio engineer
• Why have you written all of the remixes after including when this word implies only some are being mentioned?
• "Ora elaborated: "[it] was" → "Ora elaborated: "[It] was"
• "out of desire."" → "out of desire"." per MOS:QUOTE

Reception

• "garnered positive reception from" → "was met with positive reception from"
• Add the starting speech mark for "How We Do (Party)"
• "empowerment, and romance."" → "empowerment, and romance"." per MOS:QUOTE
• "praised its "street style,"" → "praised the "street style","
• "wrote the message" → "found the message"
• "as much as possible."" → "as much as possible"."
• Pipe River Online to Kingston University
• "one genre of music."" → "one genre of music"."
• Start a new para at commercial reception
• "as Ora's fifth charting single in the United Kingdom." → "standing as Ora's fifth charting single in the UK."
• "it received a" → "the song received a"
• "selling 200,000 units." → "selling 200,000 units in the country."
• Wikilink Euro Digital Song Sales to itself per MOS:LINK2SECT

Music video

• Merge with the below section, retitling to Music video and promotion
• Img looks good!
• "on 2 November." → "on 2 November 2012."
• Wikilink Kosovo
• "previous single, "R.I.P." (2012)." → "previous single "R.I.P."."
• "worn by her in it" → "worn by her in the visual"
• Remove the American magazine introduction to Rap-Up
• "in style of the" → "in the style of the"
• "It then progressively shows her and" → "She is then progressively shown with"
• "with shots of the city" → "with shots of Pristina"
• Fix MOS:QWQ issues throughout the last para
• Idolator should not be italicised and pipe to Idolator (website) per MOS:LINK2SECT
• Italicise Complex and pipe to Complex (magazine) per above
• Remove pipe on Pure Charts

Live performances

• This is too short to be its own section, so make the last para of the above one
• Remove television network introduction and wikilink for MTV

Charts

• Good

Certifications

• Good

Release history

• Label → Label(s)

References

• Copyvio score looks pretty good at 30.1%!!
• Wikilink Spotify on ref 1
• Cite Digital Spy as publisher instead on ref 3
• Wikilink Apple Music on ref 6
• Cite The Boombox as work/website instead on ref 7 with the wikilink per MOS:LINK2SECT
• Wikilink MTV on ref 9
• Cite River Online as work/website instead and pipe to Kingston University on ref 10
• Cite Complex as work/website instead on refs 11 and 36, piping to Complex (magazine) on the first ref
• Pipe Billboard to Billboard (magazine) on ref 20
• Cite Idolator as publisher instead and pipe to Idolator (website) on ref 35
• Remove or replace ref 37 since the source is a blog and pop culture website
• WP:OVERLINK of Rita Ora on ref 42

Final comments and verdict

•  On hold until all of the issues are fixed; nice work with this one! --K. Peake 11:43, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

• Hello @Kyle Peake:, hope you're well and thank you for taking the review. I have addressed all your comments. Cheers! Iaof2017 (talk) 16:03, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

• ✓ Pass now, sweet job on this! --K. Peake 21:32, 25 November 2022 (UTC)