Shila Amzah was nominated as a Music good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (March 17, 2018). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
Shila Amzah was nominated as a Music good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (September 23, 2016). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Grammar/English
editI'm slowly working through the text, lots of grammatical errors. It feels like a lot of it was literally translated from BM and a lot of redundant words. Ex-journo here so just chipping in. Regards, Royce81 (talk) 08:00, 29 January 2015 (UTC)royce81
I have made several edits so that the article confirms Wikipedia's policy with surnames, referring to the subject as Amzah instead of Shila. Many famous people are known by their first name but that is not a reason to ignore wiki's policy and call the subject by her first name unless there is a specific reason (royalty, pseudonym etc)⊾maine12329⊿ talk 12:38, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
- User:Maine12329: Problem is Amzah is a patronymic name, and she had used the mononym "Shila" at one point in her career. Timmyshin (talk) 13:14, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Image of her not wearing a hijab
editUser:Aiman851 please read WP:NOTCENSORED: "Wikipedia may contain content that some readers consider objectionable or offensive—even exceedingly so. Attempting to ensure that articles and images will be acceptable to all readers, or will adhere to general social or religious norms, is incompatible with the purposes of an encyclopedia." I understand you don't like the image, but WP:IDONTLIKEIT isn't reason to remove a valid image. Just for the record, I also think she looks more gorgeous in hijab, but without it the article lacks a photo. Also pinging User:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz. Timmyshin (talk) 12:32, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Copyright problem removed
editPrior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 18:07, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Shila Amzah. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120923210853/http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=%2F2012%2F9%2F22%2Fnation%2F12066101&sec=nation to http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=%2F2012%2F9%2F22%2Fnation%2F12066101&sec=nation
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121229091732/http://music.yahoo.com/news/world-music-awards-postponed-due-visa-issues-newtown-184127140.html to http://music.yahoo.com/news/world-music-awards-postponed-due-visa-issues-newtown-184127140.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:36, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Shila Amzah. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151227115528/http://news.hexun.com/2012-09-21/146123580.html to http://news.hexun.com/2012-09-21/146123580.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121001002625/http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=%2F2012%2F9%2F29%2Fnation%2F12098173&sec=nation to http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=%2F2012%2F9%2F29%2Fnation%2F12098173&sec=nation
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120928143040/http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=%2F2012%2F9%2F27%2Fnation%2F12088219&sec=nation to http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=%2F2012%2F9%2F27%2Fnation%2F12088219&sec=nation
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:02, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Shila Amzah/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Mike Christie (talk · contribs) 18:23, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
I'll review this.
- There is some insufficient paraphrasing; see this comparison.
- I see the article had copyright violations in the past; I'll do some additional checking, but can I first confirm that you're aware of the issues and understand that you can't use text from outside sources in this article without paraphrasing?
- There's a good deal of uncited material in the article; please add citations.
I'm going to pause the review here to allow these problems to be addressed; I'll continue the review once everything is cited and the paraphrasing is taken care of. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 18:42, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
- Aiman851, are you planning to work on this? I will fail this in a week if there is no response. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 12:01, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
- Failing this as there has been no response. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 14:42, 17 March 2018 (UTC)