Talk:Shifting balance theory
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled edit
Many edits are still necessary. You will (no doubt) notice that many of the heading are still empty.
Questions:
- How much emphasis should be made on primary literature?
The SBT is still not widely accepted (though neither is it widely rejected) in modern evolutionary biologist. Obviously I should give equal weight to those who I personally disagree with (Coyne et al.) and those who I agree with (Wade et al.)?
PS, edit under your real name to save your thesis committee heart-ache. Matthew Ackerman (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 19:51, 23 May 2011 (UTC).
After reading this article, I have no idea what the theory is, other than that I would need to read a number of other pages in order to find an answer. The article could stand a better definition at the top, in layman's terms. Crymerci (talk) 03:23, 9 September 2012 (UTC)