Talk:Sheldon names

Latest comment: 14 years ago by BilCat in topic Merge proposal

Merge proposal edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
No consensus. - BilCat (talk) 01:33, 19 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

NATO reporting name and Sheldon names clearly should be merged. I would suggest the more official name as actual page and the other one as redirect. But which name is more official? Tomdo08 (talk) 17:56, 26 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

  • Oppose - "Sheldon names" don't appear to be related to the NATO system except in that they were assigned to Soviet vehicles. - BilCat (talk) 18:14, 26 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose - As BilCat notes, the two schemas are unrelated. In fact, the NATO codenames were classified, so Sheldon's identification system was intended to offer a practical approach for non-classified usage. Askari Mark (Talk) 02:08, 27 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.