Talk:Sheffield incest case

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Rbrwr in topic Gordon Brown quote

Article name and scope

edit

In spirit with my WP:BLP1E, I think we need to restructure the article to cover the event rather than the person. I agree that the current state of the article is much better and I commend Sticky for his tremendous work expanding it, but as with Josef Fritzl which redirects to Fritzl case, we should do the same with this article. Regards SoWhy 08:18, 2 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Sheffield incest case. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:42, 26 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Gordon Brown quote

edit

I restored Gordon Brown as the source of the quote in the first sentence of "Response of government and local authorities". This had been changed in a fairly obvious act of vandalism in this edit: [1]. I can't find a source for the exact quote given but he did say something similar in an answer to Clegg at PMQs on 26 November 2008, see here: [2] --rbrwr± 07:34, 14 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Difficult to understand sentence

edit

The following sentence under the heading "British Fritzl" is hard to understand:
"Unlike in previous cases, no disclosure of police records or child protection files by corrupt (ex)-professionals who had worked the case was necessary for him to be exposed notwithstanding the injunctions."
Hopefully someone familiar with the intention could fix it, thanks.