This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
There is nothing here about the political / nationalist / expansionist nature of this organization, which exists to increase the population of the West Bank settlements. I don't know a whole lot about the organization, but this is what it's best known for internationally, by far. <eleland/talkedits> 02:12, 6 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
I am not sure who wrote this but he is not a native english speaker. A lot of the english text needs to be corrected. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Reticulosite (talk • contribs) 20:51, 25 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Too much is repeated here from the article on the Bnei Menashe, tilting this one to being mostly about them. That part needs to be summarized even more, as nothing new was offered here. Also, that section needs to be rewritten because of laboured English. It also sounds as if someone opposes this organization - RS must be used consistently.Parkwells (talk) 04:32, 10 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
