Talk:Shaun Goater/GA1

GA Reassessment

This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. Please make sure that the article is constantly updated to ensure it remains up to date with his career. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Regards, --Jackyd101 (talk) 01:08, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

• It is reasonably well written.

  a (prose): b (MoS):

Prose is OK. Probably a 7/10 with a few points where it dips lower.--Jackyd101 (talk) 01:08, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

• It is factually accurate and verifiable.

  a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

I would like to see a source for the final paragraph on the section on his work in Bermuda, but its not going to lose the article its GA status.--Jackyd101 (talk) 01:08, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

• It is broad in its coverage.

  a (major aspects): b (focused):

Personal life section could be substantially improved, see Brian Urlacher for an example of how lay one out.--Jackyd101 (talk) 01:08, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

• It follows the neutral point of view policy.

  a (fair representation): b (all significant views):

• It is stable.

  

• It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.

  a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):

• Overall:

  a Pass/Fail: