Talk:Sharon Moalem
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Ambiguosity in topic Has the relevance of this article changed to the point where the decision to delete should be reconsidered?
 | This article was nominated for deletion on December 24 2006. The result of the discussion was delete. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Has the relevance of this article changed to the point where the decision to delete should be reconsidered? edit
As shown above, this talk page was deleted in 2006/07. I assume that the main article was also deleted then, as its history identifies 'revision' in January 2014 but goes back no further.
This leads to a few obvious questions, that should be answered before any further work is done on the page:
- Has the relevance of the article's subject changed since it was deleted?
- Is the subject now of an importance that permits of a Wikipedia biographical entry?
- Where is the review of the deletion decision, that presumably took place before the page was recreated?
To answer these questions in a slightly different order:
- I am not aware of the process that is to be followed in reinstating a page, but assume there is one.
- The subject's first book was published in 2007 - presumably after the deletion decision had been made. Since then the subject has published books in 2009 and 2014. These books appear to be of a prominence that make the author a worthy subject for Wikipedia.
- Yes.
If nobody who actually has a clue pops by to look at this article and its talk, I will try to find out what the process is for my third question. (i.e. I'm holding out for a hero.) Ambiguosity (talk) 14:39, 13 April 2017 (UTC)