Talk:Shaolin Monastery Stele

Archaeology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Discovered

Latest comment: 7 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

It feels wrong to me to say that massive tablets that have been on display since 728 were "discovered" by Du Mu in 1513. The source document might well be correct in terms of him going there and documenting them, but even it explicitly says he went there to see these ancient texts, so he obviously already knew of them.

These weren't lost under rubble.

(In general the whole article could also use a clean up of the text, I assume it is a translation- it conveys great information, but isn't in as fluid English as it could be. I might try to get to it when I find some time!)

Quarrel (talk) 13:27, 16 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic