Talk:Shane Ross
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Bankers
editMight it not be possible to include a reference to Shane Ross's book, The Bankers, on the Article Page (Penguin Ireland, 2009). The work, subtitled How The Banks Brought Ireland to its Knees, is undoubtedly controversial; but it allows the common Irishman or Irishwoman many valuable insights into how their money, as well as their equity, is used by banks, by property developers and by the Irish Government. It also raises questions as to how Bank Regulators, External Auditors and Non-Executive Directors safeguard the savings and the assets of those same Irish bank customers. On a wider scale, it gives at least a substantial part of the background to the "killer" budgets introduced in Ireland in 2009.PeadarMaguidhir (talk) 17:14, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
- Done. Snappy (talk) 23:06, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
Ruth Buchanan
editJust wondering if she is retired and therefore a past tense would be needed to added where she is described as is an RTE employee 86.45.62.58 (talk) 14:49, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, she is retired [1], article updated.
Ross and INM
editI have removed some large chunks of text in this article, evidently added by a single editor two years ago (and one who has made few other contributions, which makes it look like a Single Purpose Account). They refer to Ross's attitude to Independent News and Media, and imply that Ross has avoided criticism of this company (which employs him as a journalist) while being highly critical of other companies (and being critical of those who criticise the company). This looks like the work of someone with an axe to grind. It's possible that there is some substance in these charges, but all of the citations were from Ross's own articles - there is no independent source making these allegations. This is original research. If there is anything to them, it should be possible to find a reliable source. I would normally ask for a citation for these, but the commentary is far too detailed for this - it needs to be extensively written, properly sourced, and from a neutral perspective if it is to go back in. --Rbreen (talk) 22:35, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Shane Ross. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130607101630/http://www.financejobs.ie/display_article.php?i=7463&n=820 to http://www.financejobs.ie/display_article.php?i=7463&n=820
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120213080002/http://www.shane-ross.ie/archives/456/where-were-the-auditors/ to http://www.shane-ross.ie/archives/456/where-were-the-auditors/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:27, 4 May 2017 (UTC)