Talk:Shaadi Ke Side Effects

removed a recently-added "reference"

I removed this link that was recently added to the References section. The web site may contain useful information, but as a blog, it is not a reliable source. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 20:48, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

I removed it again for the same reason. This time it was added in a way that was poorly formatted. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 02:45, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Lets talk it and avoid edit war

Trailer release date from http://www.dnaindia.com/entertainment/report-movie-trailer-shaadi-ke-side-effects-starring-farhan-akhtar-and-vidya-balan-officially-released-1910271

Trailer perception from Biswadeep Ghosh. "The side effects of sequels". India Today. Retrieved 21 February 2014 and http://www.bollywoodnasha.com/shaadi-ke-side-effects-box-office-prediction/

Music reviews http://www.koimoi.com/bollywood-movies/music-reviews/shaadi-ke-side-effects-music-review/ and http://bollyspice.com/75611/shaadi-ke-side-effects-music-review

Asia cup from http://www.espncricinfo.com/asia-cup-2014/content/series/671665.html?template=fixtures and http://www.indicine.com/movies/bollywood/will-asia-cup-cricket-matches-affect-shaadi-ke-side-effects/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hrfunmola (talk • contribs) 17:34, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Bollyspice, Bollywood Nasha, Indicine are all unreliable sources. And tabloid guessing on whether a cricket match "may" influence a film's box office prospect is pure guesswork and should not be included. If the collections are affected, "after" the film releases then we can find reliable sources to put it. As for the music, Koimoi awards it 3 stars out of 5. How is that a bad reaction? -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 17:38, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

in addition, even if they were reliable sources (which they are not) AND the content in the article accurately reflected the sources (which it doesnt), none of that is worthy of being in the lead. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 17:50, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Krimuk brother it is not a guess work this is what has happened in india. Cricket always effect be it IPL or normal series. Trade analyst are saying this. Watch this second source http://www.bollywoodlife.com/news-gossip/shaadi-ke-side-effects-trade-buzz-will-the-asia-cup-affect-the-box-office-collection-of-farhan-akhtar-vidya-balan-starrer/. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hrfunmola (talk • contribs) 17:53, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

it is a guess WP:CRYSTAL and not allowed by policy. and that is not a reliably published source, either.-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 18:00, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

with reference to my talk page disscusion and disscussion above TheRedPenOfDoom and Krimuk90 I told you yesterday that trailer and music failed to create desired buzz still you kept wrongly arguing that all bolly wood sites are not reliable but you forgot that bolly wood news from all such sites are 99 out of 100 times correct in the past. You can conduct an audit of any past news after which you will also agree with me. NOW see the result of box office reception news from Indicine http://www.indicine.com/movies/bollywood/shaadi-ke-side-effects-box-office-opening/ and Box office india http://boxofficeindia.com/Details/art_detail/shaadikesideeffectshasaverageopening#.UxBKlOOSy_w and addatoday http://www.addatoday.com/2014/02/shaadi-ke-side-effects-box-office.html MOVIE TAKES A SLOW TO AVERAGE START. In the evening you will see the news of cricket effecting collections. NEXT TIME never argue with RS on Bollywood because we are WP helping hands.

Vaibhave reviews are mixed and you deleting bad reviews and adding good ones. Please be impartial and put every kind of reviews. Like, NDTV Saibal Chatterjee says Sadly, a large part of Shaadi Ke Side Effects, despite charming pivotal performances by Farhan Akhtar and Vidya Balan, has nothing new to offer beyond convenient homilies on gender politics within the confines of a marriage. Zeenews Aparna Mudi says The first half is all you expect from a rom-com, it is funny, quirky, set at an even pace and mirrors modern marriages somewhat successfully. But the humour fizzles out after that. It gets lengthy and somewhat loses the appeal that it promises. Indian Express says Shubhra Gupta marriage takes two, and the tango here is only from Sid’s perspective : how about showing us what it could be like from Trisha’s ? Biswadeep Ghos says of the casting that "One can visualise Farhan as Rahul's Sid, but Vidya as Mallika's Trisha is tough to imagine. "The side effects of sequels". India Today.. Sneha May Francis writes Saket’s narrative slumps innumerable times over the two-hour-and-twenty-five-minutes screen time.http://www.emirates247.com/entertainment/films-music/bollywood-review-did-vidya-balan-and-farhan-akhtar-nail-it-in-shaadi-ke-side-effects-2014-02-27-1.539812 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hrfunmola (talk • contribs) 14:16, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

Dear all , No response means you are agreed and there is consensus. Hrfunmola (talk) 03:11, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

you cannot make the assumption of consensus when you wait less than 12 hours.

you need reliable sources to make ANY commentary and analysis, per the policies of WP:OR and WP:NPOV. Your suggested content is completely comprised of WP:OR and WP:NPOV commentary based on sources that do not meet the criteria established at WP:RS of having a reputation for fact checking, accuracy and an editorial oversight. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 03:46, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

Removing the crux of the reliably sourced material

TheRedpenofdoom Can you explain what I have done wrong. How could it be called vandalism. I just put information not from my own self but from very reliable source Business insider. see http://www.businessinsider.in/entertainment/movies/Box-Office-Shaadi-Ke-Side-Effects-Fails-ToHit-A-High-Note-Anuradha-Just-A-Shoddy-Tear-jerker/articleshow/31393894.cmsHrfunmola (talk) 02:40, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

This isn't a proper English sentence. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 02:44, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Lede

Hrfunmola please be careful what you assert. My only concern was the copyright violation, not if the material was sourced properly which Krimuk90 contends it isn't. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 19:56, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Created by a blocked user in 2012

Note that this article was created by a sock-puppet of a blocked user in violation of a block or ban (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ali Mohammad Khilji/Archive and the block logs of User:Ali Mohammad Khilji and User:Greatuser for details). Due to extensive editing by others, it is not eligible for speedy-deletion under WP:CSD#G5. Creations by banned or blocked users. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 18:52, 19 March 2014 (UTC)