Talk:Seymour line

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move. Jafeluv (talk) 22:53, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

---

Seymour railway line, Victoria → Seymour V/Line rail service — 1. dab Victoria removed per nearly unanimous decision atTalk:Ballarat to Daylesford railway line; 2. V/Line as article about service not the line which is longer and has an article); 3. rail to be included in titles as V/Line also operate coach services Crusoe8181 (talk) 10:35, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

• Warrnambool railway line → Warrnambool V/Line rail service
• Traralgon railway line → Traralgon V/Line rail service
• Geelong railway line, Victoria → Geelong V/Line rail service
• Bairnsdale railway line → Bairnsdale V/Line rail service
• Ballarat railway line, Victoria → Ballarat V/Line rail service
• Ararat railway line, Victoria → Ararat V/Line rail service
• Albury-Wodonga railway line, Victoria → Albury-Wodonga V/Line rail service
• Support all Much less confusing and much more accurate. Allows for clear separation between the physical lines and the services operating on the line. Great idea and I hope the same concept is adopted elsewhere in Australia. -- Mattinbgn (talk) 10:50, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
• Support makes more sense to have the service article under the name of the service, especially as the actual lines are under a seperate article title anyway. Also as the lines can/do have multiple services operating on them. Gnangarra 11:22, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
• Support all, articles are about services, not about lines.--Grahame (talk) 00:41, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 1 October 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Superseded by Talk:Albury V/Line rail service#Requested move 3 October 2024. Mackensen (talk) 22:19, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

---

Seymour V/Line rail service → Seymour line – Under WP:COMMONNAME, the name should be "Seymour line" not "Seymour V/Line rail service" ThylacineHunter (talk) 03:15, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

• Note: This should have probably been done as a multi-move request as all of the following are under similar move requests: Albury V/Line rail service, Ballarat V/Line rail service, Bendigo V/Line rail service, Geelong V/Line rail service, Gippsland V/Line rail service, Seymour V/Line rail service, and Warrnambool V/Line rail service. Fork99 (talk) 07:33, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Albury V/Line rail service which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 22:48, 3 October 2024 (UTC)