Talk:Sex trafficking in Laos

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Southeast Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Southeast Asia-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Southeast AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Southeast AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Southeast AsiaSoutheast Asia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Laos (assessed as Low-importance).

Crime and Criminal Biography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sexology and sexuality: Sex work Low‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Sex work task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Delete: Inaccurate article with decades old sources, not representing current situation edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago4 comments4 people in discussion

The article should be deleted because it is full of inaccuracies and was written by someone with no oversight into the real situation but with a clear political agenda and superficial research. Some of the cited sources are from 2010, and it's easy to see why: the author couldn't find anything more recent. It is not acceptable to make generalizations based on some one-off events that happened 10+ years ago.

For reference, please see the original authors user page.

193.106.50.7 (talk) 18:11, 13 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

The years for the sources, before you deleted them, were 2014, 2010, 2017, 2014, 2012, 2018, 2018, and 2013. After your edits, the years of the only three sources remaining were 2010, 2017, and 2013. You made the sources older. GuineaPigC77 (talk) 18:32, 13 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Not sure why you are playing ignorant. This entire article should be deleted as it is inaccurate as a whole.

It was clearly built around a template (sex trafficking in COUNTRYNAME) by an editor with a clear and self-defined political agenda. The references are cherry-picked to fit the template and its narrative. All of this is very obvious to anyone who is willing to spend more than a minute on it. Yet here you are doing what you do, restoring a very very flawed article, and your only argument for doing so is a tongue in cheek comment that doesn't even contradict what was said earlier. This is why Wikipedia is not what it used to be and can no longer be trusted.

Good job with keeping Wikipedia biased! Mimipedya (talk) 08:36, 14 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

If you feel the article is inaccurate or biased then you need to provide references to support that. You can't just change the article to how you think it should be without providing references for the changes. Throwing aspersions at other editors is not a substitute to providing facts to support your viewpoint. --John B123 (talk) 10:58, 14 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic