Talk:Sex recession

Latest comment: 1 day ago by Klbrain in topic Feedback from New Page Review process

Feedback from New Page Review process

edit

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: There is an argument to made as to whether this warrants a stand-alone page, or would be better incorporated into a broader topic like Human sexual activity#Frequency. There's also some 'shot-gun' referencing; using multiple citation to support the same point isn't helpful to readers because it doesn't help them to find the more appopriate source for verification or further reading. So, perhaps use the citations "[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]" to develop the article further and differentiate the key points being made in each of those sources (or reduce their number if they're redundant).

Klbrain (talk) 17:18, 10 July 2024 (UTC)Reply