Talk:Sex, Love & Secrets/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Freikorp (talk · contribs) 12:27, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   Should you clarify in the infobox that the official website is an archived version?

   Clarified. Aoba47 (talk) 21:45, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

   "from September 27, 2005 and October 18, 2005" - should this be "from September 27, 2005 to October 18, 2005"?

   Revised. Aoba47 (talk) 21:45, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

   Do you think it's important to list all the executive producers in the lead considering none of them are notable enough to have a Wikipedia article?

   Good point. Removed. Aoba47 (talk) 21:45, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

   I'd introduce John Kenneth Muir as a "critic"

   Added. Aoba47 (talk) 21:45, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

   "while the official website references" - this seems an odd choice of word, why not just say 'states' instead of 'references'

   Good point. Revised. Aoba47 (talk) 21:45, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

   'and lines include: "Be it Santa Claus, Twinkies, infidelity or murder, all humans keep secrets."' - I'm not sure if this adds anything to the article. It's a pretty silly thing to say; is that what you're trying to convey to the reader? That the narration wasn't very serious? Is this narration quote typical?

   I think that it is important to include a portion from the v/o since the entire second paragraph is about this, and (unfortunately) this is the only example that I could find from a credible source. Aoba47 (talk) 21:45, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

   "while using "clinical terms"" - any chance we can get an example?

   Unfortunately, I could not find any examples about this. Aoba47 (talk) 21:45, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

   A thought to be dead boyfriend coming back into her life seems like a pretty big deal. Makes me want to know more about the circumstances. I understand it might be difficult to expand on this with brevity though

   Unfortunately, I could not find further information about this. I had trouble finding information about show's storylines beyond the pilot. Aoba47 (talk) 21:45, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

   "Preview videos were released on the official website for Sex, Love & Secrets" - I'd just say 'Preview videos were released on the shows official website'

   Revised. Aoba47 (talk) 21:45, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Has an appropriate reference section:

   B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail: Looks really good overall. Placing on hold until issues are addressed. Freikorp (talk) 12:47, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

   @Freikorp: Thank you for the review. I believe that I have addressed everything. I hope that you are having a wonderful weekend so far. Aoba47 (talk) 21:45, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

   Looks good. Happy for this to pass now. Freikorp (talk) 22:05, 5 May 2018 (UTC)