Talk:Severe Tropical Storm Lionrock (2010)/GA1
Latest comment: 14 hours ago by TyphoonAmpil in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: TheNuggeteer (talk · contribs) 06:27, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: TyphoonAmpil (talk · contribs) 03:29, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
Hello im Review GA i fix Errors Tomorrow 🌀TyphoonAmpil🌀 (💬 - Typhoon) 03:29, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think you should fix the errors; you should spot the errors instead so I can fix it, that how GA reviewing works. I also see this is your first review, so be careful! Make sure to review the article, check the sources and see if they match, and make sure the article covers everything about the subject. Good luck!
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | ||
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | MoS guidelines | |
2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | ||
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | Errors with inline citations. | |
2c. it contains no original research. | ||
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | Likely | |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | ||
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | Likely good | |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | ||
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | ||
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | All images good | |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | The images are relevant to the topic. | |
7. Overall assessment. |
Lead
editOk all fixed Use mdy dates and Infobox 🌀TyphoonAmpil🌀 (💬 - Typhoon) 04:02, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think you should fix it yourself, since you are the review, point the problems and let me fix it.
🍗TheNuggeteer🍗
04:19, 31 August 2024 (UTC)- @TheNuggeteer the Lead is
Severe Tropical Storm Lionrock, known in the Philippines as Severe Tropical Storm Florita, was a tropical cyclone that affected the areas of China and Taiwan. Forming on August 25, the storm drifted west and crossed the island of Luzon, the storm later became a tropical depression before being named by the Joint Typhoon Warning Center as Lionrock. Over the next few days, the storm remained stationary in the South China Sea, then started to move slowly before merging with tropical storm Namtheun, absorbing the latter. The storm made its way onto China before weakening and eventually dissipating over China. The storm affected Hong Kong, making the government issue multiple warnings. Total damages in China were also counted to be CNY 441 million (US$65.1 million).
can fix? 🌀TyphoonAmpil🌀 (💬 - Typhoon) 04:24, 31 August 2024 (UTC)- What do you want me to fix in the lead?
🍗TheNuggeteer🍗
04:27, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- What do you want me to fix in the lead?
- @TheNuggeteer the Lead is
Meteorological history
editHello 1 fixed Earlier August 25
fix all
- No original research.
- Reliable sources only remove unreliable
- Neutral point of view
🌀TyphoonAmpil🌀 (💬 - Typhoon) 04:32, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- I reverted your edit for the removal of sources, because the item and I quote, says: "General repositories like Academia.edu, HAL Open Archives, ResearchGate, Semantic Scholar, and Zenodo host academic papers, conference proceedings, book chapters, preprints, technical reports, etc. No filters exist for quality, and will host several unreviewed preprints, retracted papers not marked as such, unreviewed manuscripts, and even papers from predatory journals. Determine the original source of what is being cited to establish reliability. When possible, cite the original source in preference to the repository." Basically, stating that "It depends if the author is experienced and reliable". And since the author works on a meteorological agency, I'd say yes, this is reliable.
🍗TheNuggeteer🍗
04:38, 31 August 2024 (UTC)- Can you tell me why you removed it again?
🍗TheNuggeteer🍗
04:46, 31 August 2024 (UTC)- @TheNuggeteer ok was removed 🌀TyphoonAmpil🌀 (💬 - Typhoon) 04:51, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Can you tell me why you removed it again?
Preparations and impact
editTypos and problems here. the text is good? 🌀TyphoonAmpil🌀 (💬 - 📝) 08:50, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Can you tell me the typos?
🍗TheNuggeteer🍗
08:56, 31 August 2024 (UTC)- @TheNuggeteer Not say letters own find Typo click edit 🌀TyphoonAmpil🌀 (💬 - 📝) 09:05, 31 August 2024 (UTC)