This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
There are a few problems with this quote. First, the fact that it is in broken English makes me distrust the translation. Does anyone have the Van de Ven book referenced here that can check on it? Secondly, it seems to be a disparaging remark on the classics, which doesn't make sense with the surrounding content in the article. If it's important, we may want to set it apart. —Zujine|talk 17:35, 17 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
