Talk:Seth P. Waxman
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
relation
editDoes he have any relation to Henry Waxman? WooyiTalk to me? 00:44, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
No.
B.?
editWhy does Seth B. Waxman (by which he is cited in the text of the majority decision in Boumediene v. Bush) redirect here? Is it a mistake in the decision? Does he also go by a different middle name? - dcljr (talk) 20:58, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
Citizens United vs. FEC
editIn light of Seth P. Waxman's contributions to the Citizens United vs. FEC Case, shouldn't it be included in this article?
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission 558 U.S. 310 (2010) is a landmark U.S. constitutional law, campaign finance, and corporate law case dealing with regulation of political campaign spending by organizations.
...
Former Bush Solicitor General Ted Olson and First Amendment lawyer Floyd Abrams argued for Citizens United, and former Clinton Solicitor General Seth Waxman defended the statute on behalf of various supporters.[1] Legal scholar Erwin Chemerinsky called it "one of the most important First Amendment cases in years".[2]
―Matthew J. Long -Talk-☖ 18:38, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
References
- ^ "Hillary: The Oral Argument". The Washington Post.
- ^ Liptak, Adam (2009-08-06). "Sotomayor Faces Heavy Workload of Complex Cases". The New York Times.