Talk:Service number

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Random alphabetic number? That doesn't make sense :) --99.250.177.248 (talk) 21:19, 5 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Similarly, 'meaningless checksum' in the Royal Navy service number doesn't make sense - either it's meaningless or it's a checksum :) --Lordandmaker (talk) 00:03, 12 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

I think we need some more countries on the list, we need expansion. of the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.175.17.50 (talk) 22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Are they back to using "service numbers" as of 2015? edit

This article needs to be updated, since it basically stops the narrative as of 2011 (saying that something "will happen" in 2015).

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Service number. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:50, 6 January 2018 (UTC)Reply