Talk:Service delivery platform
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SDP no longer relevant edit
With the advent of API Gateways, full stack BSS platforms and devops ways of working, the SDP concept should be considered legacy. There are no recent standards, even device management, LBS, etc. standards are considered legacy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 197.185.99.31 (talk) 17:41, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Early comments edit
Is the service delivery platform mainly concerns deliver service to mobile clients?
fyi - I have requested that anonymous users be prevented from editing this page to prevent further marketing info from being added. MxHyway 19:47, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
No SDP aren't mainly meant for the GSM network, also for PSTN, etc. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.93.43.127 (talk) 09:43, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
wwite edit
Article has at least two places saying "See wwite.com article:" with no link/references. I went to wwite.com and couldn't find the first article. Should these references be removed?
Article clean up edit
This article is in need of a copy-edit. There are external links in the main text, very few relevant citations and surprisingly little information about SDPs. I've flagged it for clean up and left a note on the telecommunications wikiproject page.
User:SimonInns 17:38, 05 May 2010 (CET)
Bad Reference edit
This article starts with a bad reference. It says that TM Forum is working to define a standard for SDPs and links to their website; while it's true they're working on it, their documentation is pay-to-read, which is absurd since it aims to be a standard. Users should be informed about that so that they do not waste their time looking for something they can find but not use, especially when there's absolutely no reference to the OCCI (http://occi-wg.org/) standard which is open and available to everyone.
93.62.155.238 (talk) 08:38, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
Edit request edit
 | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
 | The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
Xavient Information Systems (Xavient) does not have a Wikipedia page currently, but is working to build one for publication. Temporarily, I would like to request that within the Service delivery platform article, the page users are directed to when they click "Xavient Information Systems" that lists Xavient as not having a page on Wikipedia is removed and replaced with a link to the company's website at www.xavient.com. The link to the website will only be used temporarily until Xavient's page is developed and published. I am new to Wikipedia, and am using the talk page to ensure properly reviewed edits and conflict of interest (COI) compliance.
Thank you.
Hankypanky789 (talk) 20:18, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
Not done Wikipedia's policy on external links does not allow a link to your external website on this page. Joseph2302 (talk) 23:28, 29 December 2015 (UTC)