Talk:September 2009 Xinjiang unrest

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Cyberbot II in topic External links modified

Image

edit

HK_Sept13_protest_2.jpg was swapped back on wikimedia commons. The image copied over does not actually have the right license. Benjwong (talk) 03:17, 17 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Ah, yes...it looks like, while they're both from the same flickr set, the one Ohconfucius uploaded is tagged as non-commercial whereas the other one isn't. Strangely enough. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 03:23, 17 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
  • I'm sorry I missed the 'non-commercial' licence on the replacement image I uploaded. I just think the first image is crap, as it's of just a bunch of photographers, and could have been taken anywhere. I will remove it unless/until a better one is found. Ohconfucius (talk) 03:34, 17 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Reporters' assault

edit

This is only a sideshow (although an important one), and I don't believe it serves any encyclopaedic purpose to have the names of all 8 (non-notable) journalists listed in the article, as WP is not the news, and not a directory. I have therefore removed them, as well as the Chinese language source made redundant in the removal. Ohconfucius (talk) 03:46, 17 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

How can a few journalist be taking a beating and their names not be pointed out? The article currently list out Li Zhi who doesn't even have any ties to the event other than getting dismissed. The 3 journalists are relevant. I would understand if you said the later 5 were not as famous. Benjwong (talk) 03:53, 17 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
I don't think the names are necessary. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 03:56, 17 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
That has to be your personal opinion. Li Zhi is sipping tea in the office and getting fired. He is more important than the 3 journalists in the front line? No possible way. Benjwong (talk) 03:58, 17 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
  • What Li Zhi is doing now is not why he is notable. He is notable by virtue of his [former] positions. Whatever happens, I don't think the 8 journalists (in this context) will ever be notable, although the incident is notable (but fails the notability presumption in WP:N). I don't agree with the revert, but I'm not going to war over it. Let consensus prevail. Ohconfucius (talk) 04:09, 17 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Meng Jianzhu

edit

Always nice to read a bit of China Daily once in a while to regurgitate the slogans... Police Chief Meng Jianzhu: "The recent syringe attacks, which were premeditated, masterminded and conducted by law-breakers and instigated by ethnic separatist forces, were a continuation of the July 5 incident in the city" [1] Colipon+(Talk) 17:05, 17 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

teh uighur terrorists kills the innocent chinese ppl —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rjanag (talkcontribs) 17:36, 17 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on September 2009 Xinjiang unrest. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:29, 29 January 2016 (UTC)Reply