Pope-elect

edit

Carlos, I commend your historical research into this topic. I would note that no one claims Vicedomini was actually a pope, only a pope-elect. Given the norms prevailing at the time, there was no dispute that a pope-elect who died before proclamation (and thus enthroning) would not be considered a pope. Thus, John XXI not mentioning him as his predecessor is not that strong a piece of evidence against this. The lack of contemporary accounts and the dispute over whether his relative was a cardinal are stronger pieces of evidence, but I think this article currently is too conclusive. I would prefer that the subject be treated more neutrally and not include statements like "All these facts seem to justify the conclusion, that the story about pope-elect Gregory XI is a fiction". This is sourced, which is good, but it should also be attributed (ideally, quoted) rather than being stated as objective fact. Savidan 14:10, 5 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

The silence of pope John XXI is a strong evidence - according to decree In Nomine Domini pope-elect has a full authority from the time of his election - proclamation of the election doesn't matter here. I've changed the final sentence - I think it now sounds better, but I'm open for the discussion and further remarks CarlosPn (talk) 14:38, 5 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Cardinal-nephew

edit

The title is not a title held for life, only during Uncle's reign. Also, not every papal nephew who is a cardinal is a cardinal-nephew, as e.g. Alessandro Farnese and Ranuccio Farnese. Also, also, the title is wildly anachronistic. Neither the title nor the office existed in the thirteenth century. Vicedomino (talk) 06:17, 12 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:07, 18 February 2023 (UTC)Reply