Talk:Seoul Lite

Non-free images in this article

Its ridiculous. WP:NFCC requires minimal usage. There are way too many non-free images in this article. Even with a rationale they are still non-compliant, since there are way too many non-free files that are unneeded within this article. ViperSnake151  Talk  20:23, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

I agree. The infobox image and at the very most one interior image should be the absolute maximum. --timsdad ^(talk) 00:59, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

While I agree that there are indeed excessive images, I would disagree that some of them are "unneeded" nor that you should set an arbitrary value to limit the number of images in this article. I removed the ones that are indeed unneeded, like the two floor images, which are basically showing the same thing. But other images show very distinctive parts of the building, so are unique and non-replaceable with a free alternative, which is the given rationale. Softjuice (talk) 14:18, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Photos needed

Aren't there Wikipedia fans? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.78.90.176 (talk) 02:26, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Name

Is the building also known as Light Tower? I read this on skyscraperpage.com. Jerchel (talk) 16:13, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

No its "Seoul Lite".

Nabil rais2008 (talk) 16:27, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Well, have a look at that here: [1] Jerchel (talk) 15:10, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Is this being built or cancelled?

The article is confusing about that. Infobox gives 2015 est. for opening, tense is usually will, but the section on cancellation suggests this project was dropped. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:28, 7 May 2013 (UTC)