Talk:Sense and Antisense (Millennium)
Latest comment: 11 years ago by TBrandley in topic GA Review
Sense and Antisense (Millennium) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on September 4, 2012. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Millennium's "Sense and Antisense" underwent several rewrites to lessen its focus on race relations? |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
GA Review edit
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Sense and Antisense (Millennium)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: TBrandley (talk · contribs) 03:22, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
- Infobox: When writing dates, use the {{start date}} template, only for infoboxes, tables, stuff like that
- Infobox: Where is the production code referenced? There should be something at IGN or epguides, or at the very least, the DVD set
- Infobox: Where is the running time referenced? There should be something at the iTunes Store
- Infobox: Where are the guest actors referenced? Anything at Radio Times, etc.
- Infobox: Could you cut down the red links? They look weird. Lol.
- Looking into possibly creating John Peter Kousakis soon, Zinyk I believe is a reasonably seasoned stage actor and could also be created. GRAPPLE X 17:49, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
- Lede: Pretty sure that crime and thriller are overlinks, thus a violation of WP:OVERLINK
- Lede: "premiered" should be "originally aired"
- Lede: Only Fox should be linked, without network
- Lede: "some folk". Could you clarify?
- Lede: Add "The show centers on ... In this episode, ..." to second paragraph before plot summary to let viewers know.
- Lede: Summary seems a bit small
- Lede: The lede seems to be a little short, and may violate WP:LEDE. Nielsen rating, etc. Considering that, if nothing more can be added, perhaps merge into two paragraphs, because, right now, it seems short for three
- Lede: "has" is not needed before "received"
- Lede: "mixed responses" seems weird. How about: "mixed reviews"
- Lede: "in its initial broadcast" → "upon its initial broadcast"
- Lede: "in its initial broadcast" where? In Canada, UK, US, France, Germany? (For the record, I know it's the US, just to clarify with some that do not know)
- Plot: The paragraphs are really short detracting from the readability of it. Could you merge some paragraphs?
- Plot: "drug addict" a link?
- Linked to Substance dependence. GRAPPLE X 17:49, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
- Production: comma is missing after "' final episode"
- Production: Any image to add? Or something else in article.
- Broadcast and reception: Only Fox should be linked, without network
- Broadcast and reception: "Nielsen rating of 6.7 during its original broadcast". That makes me think that it earned a Nielsen rating when the episode was airing. Re-write.
- Broadcast and reception: "The episode received mixed reviews from critics" → "This episode generally received mixed reviews from critics"
- Broadcast and reception: C+ → "C+"
- Broadcast and reception: "VanDerWerff found the episode "entertaining". Due to the previous sentence, perhaps add "Despite this," to the beginning of it.
- Notes: 1997–1998 should be 1997–98, as per WP:YEAR
- Notes: Link 1997–1998 television season
- References: Ref. 1, 2, 3 - Link the television seasons, then remove the "19"'s from it, as per WP:YEAR. See above.
- References: Ref. 4 - I feel that citing/referencing the episode is original research
- Just a comment: All the episode's say who wrote/directed them, it's only a different medium. It's not original research, because I, for instance, could get a hold of the DVDs and verify who wrote/directed the episodes. It would be original research if the episode's didn't tell who wrote/directed them, and I added the info based on an email I had with the producer, or info I found from a fansite. My two cents.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 19:22, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
- Ditto; the episode is being cited for its credits. I could add a book source for this but I don't feel that there's anything interpretive about taking a work's credits at face value. GRAPPLE X 17:49, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
- References: Ref. 5 - Publish day?
- References: Ref. 8 - Double quotes (") should be single quotes ('), as per MOS:QUOTEMARKS and WP:MOSQUOTE. It is to avoid doubling.
- References: Ref. 10 - Remove "DVD Talk Review of the DVD Video" from title
- References: Red links
- External links: Or a lack of one. Perhaps add links from IMDb, or TV.com. This can prove that the article is brove in its coverage
- External links: Categories should be sorted in alphabetical order
Good work on this article. In good shape, I will be happy to pass once the above issues are addressed. TBrandley 00:30, 1 September 2012 (UTC)