 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Wondering why this was deleted entirely? edit
Wondering why this deletion was done in entirety. Wondering why Azodicarbonamide is completely unmentioned in this article. It seems to be a pretty notable aspect of this chemical. SageRad (talk) 21:54, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- I mean, i am completely aware that the sources were not adequate for biomedical claims as per WP:MEDRS but still, this is a very significant aspect of this chemical and it seems that content related to this ought to be in the article. Other sources do exist to which that content could be sourced. And the claims that are not biomedical can be retained without even finding additional sources. SageRad (talk) 21:58, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Hazards edit
I've added the Hazards based on the "consensus" in pubchem... but I'm not entirely sure these are uncontroversial. Sigma Aldrich for instance gives H301 (and danger signal word plus skulls pictogram) only for HCL version; otherwise only H303 (and warning signal word but no pictogram). But at least the NFPA diagram is the same... 188.26.141.244 (talk) 07:45, 28 October 2021 (UTC)