Talk:Semantic prosody

Linguistics: Theoretical Linguistics High‑importance

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Theoretical Linguistics Task Force.

What lexicographers do edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Regarding the clause, "Lexicographers have often failed to allow for semantic prosody when defining a word", isn't "allow for" being used wrongly? Why should definitions "allow for" connotations? Perhaps lexicographers ought to study, elucidate, or write articles about them, rather than "making allowances" for them. Unfree (talk) 23:57, 6 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Perhaps the author had a dim view of lexicographers, allowing for that they're all dolts, and simple chose the most neutral phrasing he could think of to describe their work. :-) 67.198.37.16 (talk) 16:50, 4 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Add topic