Archive 1

the examples need to be corrected

the "examples" are improper. they merely show a face and assert that this individual is self righteous. there is no explanation, there is no context. it is useless as an example and it potentially defames individuals (if you are able to recognize the face) because of the lack justification. it needs to be corrected. [sorry if this was formatted wrong ive never done this before.]

There is also problems with the term. The wicked my just hurl it against the not so wicked. --105.1.180.153 (talk) 11:48, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

"I am always right" listed at Redirects for discussion

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect I am always right. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 29#I am always right until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 18:45, 29 July 2021 (UTC)