Talk:Seeheimer Kreis

I created this page because I saw that other articles link to the subject. The links were red and I find this unfortunate.

To the group itself: It is really a popular and commonly know political grouping in Germany. Actually, it is the most famous one in the SPD at all. It has a strong influence in the parliament and therefore is often reported in the news. If you see the length of the article on the German Wikipedia, you can see that the group is of relevance for Germany. To me, the English Wikipedia appears to be global covering subjects that are important to the world. But isn't that the case when talking about an influencial group in a national parliament. Seeheimer Kreis is also informal. It 's real, official and commonly known in Germany.

Why do I have the feeling that the article deletion force is so aggressive. Do you have big problems with joking or spam articles? Tomeasy _{T C} 16:14, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

If it's "often reported in the news" then it won't be a problem to add references and sources that verify the notability of this topic, which is what's required. And, yes, we do have big problems with joking or spam articles; if you'd like to help out with that, welcome aboard. Accounting4Taste:talk 17:08, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Seeheimer Kreis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061229083913/http://www.seeheimer-kreis.de:80/wir_ueber_uns/seeheim_chronik/elements/elem_004/download to http://www.seeheimer-kreis.de/wir_ueber_uns/seeheim_chronik/elements/elem_004/download

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:36, 24 February 2016 (UTC)