Continuation of western bias in Wikipedia

edit

As Indiegen notes the piece is about a group with a significant body of work now with extensive media coverage. I developed this article long ago and it is still languishing in the draft stage. Random, insignificant bands from the US get a Wikipedia page with one or two references but it takes so long to get third-world articles to pass. Admins love deleting pages more than helping contribute to knowledge. Let a page live and people will start fixing it. The policies are fundamentally flawed. Popoblahblah (talk) 12:09, 10 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Seedhe Maut has extensive coverage from multiple reliable sources, the submission needs to be re-reviewed and (in my opinion) accepted

edit

Seedhe Maut is quite a notable hip hop duo in India. Just dropping this comment in support of acceptance and publication of the submission of the draft article on them. The current draft cites articles (that are primarily about that) appearing in international media (Vice) and multiple Indian newspapers and media houses (New Indian Express, Firstpost, Mid-day, Rolling Stone India, Mixmag, The Tribune, etc.). I think it sufficiently demonstrates notability and significant coverage. If reviewers can provide more detailed comments, I am happy to edit the draft so that its publication is expedited. Indiegen (talk) 19:03, 12 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Seems like the the article submission has been rejected again on 23 January 2023. This is quite said, and the basis of the rejection (notability) is absurd at face value. Vice, Firstpost, Mid-day have articles specifically about the hip hop duo. Their albums are being reviewed in top music publications. These are all in the sources. The rejection is not based on any sound argument, and does not offer any advice to the draft article authors/editors. Indiegen (talk) 14:54, 25 January 2023 (UTC)Reply