Talk:Section 91(2) of the Constitution Act, 1867

Canada: Law Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian law.

I deleted the segment stating that PIPEDA was "upheld" as a valid exercise of Parliament's trade and commerce power. There were no citations provided, and as far as I'm aware, no court has ever been asked to rule on the constitutional validity of PIPEDA. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.67.6.173 (talk) 22:07, 26 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

"Trade and commerce" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Trade and commerce. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:39, 10 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Add topic