Talk:Secrets (Regard and Raye song)/GA1

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Iaof2017 in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 10:36, 2 October 2022 (UTC)Reply


Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )
3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked   are unassessed

I will get on with this right away! --K. Peake 10:36, 2 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Infobox and lead edit

  • Infobox looks good!
  • "It was written by" → "The song was written by" to make it clear what you are referring to
  • "The song was released as" → "It was released as"
  • "It is an English-language deep and retro-sounding club, house and R&B song, touching on" → "An English-language deep and retro-sounding club, house and R&B song, it touches on"
  • "was met with critical acclaim" → "received critical acclaim"
  • "the music, production as well as Raye's" → "the music, production and Raye's"
  • Mention some of the notable countries it charted in
  • ""Secrets" received a nomination" → "The song received a nomination"

Background and composition edit

  • Any actual info you can add about the background of how the collaborators came together or what the basis of the song was?
  • Swap the release sentence with the writing/production one since that came before the release
  • Pipe bass line to Bassline
  • ""I had written the top line of [" → ""I'd written the top line [of " per paraphrasing of the source

Reception and promotion edit

  • Corona should be capitalised per the source
  • "the song as "powerful track" → "the song as a "powerful piece" per the source
  • Mention that the Dance charts are US ones
  • "and the United Kingdom." → "and the UK." per the full name having been used last time
  • "Preceded by the release of a lyrics video" → "Preceded by the release of a lyric video" with the wikilink per MOS:LINK2SECT
  • "an accompanying music video for "Secrets" was" → "a music video for "Secrets" was"
  • The word both is not needed before their roles

Track listing edit

  • Good

Charts edit

Weekly charts edit

  • For Czech Republic, Mexico and Slovakia, should more than one chart be included?
  • Remove the US Streaming Hot Dance/Electronic Streaming Songs chart per the main one being included

Year-end charts edit

Certifications edit

  • Good

Release history edit

See also edit

  • Good

References edit

  • Copyvio score looks great at 30.7%!!!
  • Radiomonitor is not the correct publisher on ref 4
  • What exactly makes ref 5 a reliable source?
Removed. --Iaof2017 (talk) 13:02, 2 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • Ref 48 should only cite IFPI Greece as publisher with the wikilink since the full name is never used
  • Fix MOS:CAPS issues with ref 51
  • Remove wikilink on TopHit for ref 90

Final comments and verdict edit

  •   On hold until all of the issues are fixed! --K. Peake 11:58, 2 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
    • Hello @Kyle Peake: thank you for this review. I will continue with the remaining issues after a few moments. Iaof2017 (talk) 13:19, 2 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
  •  Pass now, kudos to you for the quick response! --K. Peake 07:55, 3 October 2022 (UTC)Reply