Talk:Secondary data/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Untitled
Please do not delete this page. Several of us are actively working together to edit and create this page.
- Please see Wikipedia:Copyright_FAQ. --Evb-wiki 18:18, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
The hey dis is priya offending section has been rewritten. Please do not delete.
Please start providing references to infromation you add, see wikipedia policies: WP:CITE, WP:Reliable sources, following the example of a footnote I added. You may aso quote printed books in this way as well. Mukadderat 18:49, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
I tried to clean up the intro. There was some confusion about the relationship between secondary data in soc scie and secondary sources in historical studies. i tried to clear it up. --Htw3 20:26, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
 | This article is currently the subject of an educational assignment. |
Secondary is not same thing as secondary
lame ass confusion about the relationship between the analysis of secondary data in sociology and the distinction between primary and secondary resources in historical research. These are totally different things. You need to just mention the distinction as it relates to the field of history, then expunge all the discussion of those meanings or primary and secondary. they are not relevant. --Htw3 04:39, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Referencing the source materials for each section
A good thing to do will be to make it clear which of your resources were used to write the sections of the article. The comment from Mukadderat points to this need. The more directly an idea or paragraph has drawn on a particular resource the more that you should include an in text reference to that resource. --132.235.210.196 17:44, 25 October 2007 (UTC)