Talk:Second impeachment trial of Donald Trump/GA2
GA Reassessment edit
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Good Article Reassessment:
Recently, this article was passed from me, notwithstanding several errors from that review must be pointed out. Detailed criteria will follow.
1. Well-written: The article's spelling is valid and no apparent grammatical mistakes are apparent, style is generally decent. However, several parts appear of average quality. Take this, for example:
After the Senate vote, former President Trump released a statement calling the trial "yet another phase of the greatest witch hunt in the history of our Country and asserting that his movement had "only just begun."
This section is titled individually as a subheading but is short and should be merged, does not point to any main articles, and uses only a single source.
5. Stable: A closer inspection reveals even more vandalism traces than expected, including one in June that detract from stability. This article is also controversial.
Other measurements are as previously reviewed. However, given the article fails two criteria, it should no longer be a good article.