This redirect is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
This article was created or improved during Wiki Loves Pride, 2014.Wiki Loves PrideWikipedia:Wiki Loves PrideTemplate:Wiki Loves Pride talkWiki Loves Pride articles
I don't know how useful these will be, but it seems like this was a ground-breaking organization. It will no doubt be difficult to find on-line sources for an organization that was active primarily in the 1970s. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:03, 4 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
Jonesey95, Thanks for sharing. You might be interested to participate in the ongoing AfD. ---Another Believer(Talk) 19:07, 4 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
@Jonesey95:, I'm not familiar with how the mention search counts it. In the wiki article, searching "Second Foundation" returns "9" hits in the web browser. I am wondering if the mention counting in the search you mentioned counts it similarly. I'm not convinced "counts" of mention correlates to notability. Even supposing that it only counted once per listed article, an organization that tends to make financial contribution to a well known organization that regularly publish a roster of donors have a tendency to appear by the name in the donor list. Lacking contextual clue, I can't say that "mention" really has any substance. Thank you. Graywalls (talk) 16:17, 5 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
At the request of the creator, who has been serially spawning articles of this nature, I am posting on talk. See my other AfDs. Really no compelling reason to start a new argument. It's the same 'ol. The article does not assert notability, I don't think it's notable, therefore the preservationist should demonstrate at the minimum it passes both WP:GNG and WP:NORGGraywalls (talk) 18:09, 1 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
The point was to raise your concern before going to AfD. Since you've already nominated the article for deletion, we should keep discussion there and not here. ---Another Believer(Talk) 18:31, 1 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
The article makes the claim that In 1972, Second Foundation opened the Portland Gay Community Center (the city's first). Some sources say that it was the first such center in Oregon. That looks like a claim of notability to me. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:05, 4 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
