Talk:Second Edition (quartet)
Latest comment: 16 years ago by LeadSongDog in topic Untitled
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Untitled edit
What was 'ironic' about it? Presumably if it was the second version, then it was quite natural to call the quartet Second Edition, wasn't it? What do we reckon? Fix it? Brequinda 23:57, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
- The name makes sense only to the audience that knows they were Harrington Brothers. The other audience (that doesn't know) is puzzled. Hence Irony. LeadSongDog 00:31, 29 August 2007 (UTC)