Talk:Second Battle of Champagne
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CE
editGerman Strategy and the Path to Verdun: Erich von Falkenhayn and the Development of Attrition, 1870-1916 R Foley. I made an amendment to the conclusion using this source (Chapter seven) but I don't know how to cite it in the text.Keith-264 (talk) 14:51, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
- X6 p. 201, 321Keith-264 (talk) 09:44, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
Analysis
edit@Keith-264. This article contains an "Analysis" part which doesn't have any citation. Can you add citation to it, please? Regards.Ti2008 (talk) 14:11, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
- Greetings Ti2008, it's far from a complete article and not all of it is my work but I think that paragraph comes from Foley.Keith-264 (talk) 14:22, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
does not mention Petain
editApparently he may have contributed to the lessons learned document. See "His talents became most apparent when his Second Army played a large role in the September 1915 offensive in Champagne. Though the French failed to break through German defensive lines, Pétain’s after-action report identified shortcomings in French methods and provided important ideas about future operations." [1] Unable to fix this at the moment, as this is three degrees of separation from the article I am working on, but thought I would mention it as room for improvment, given his subsequent importance.Elinruby (talk) 05:05, 11 June 2020 (UTC)