Talk:Sebastian Ryall
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Criminal charges dropped
editI removed all the material about criminal charges from this page now that the charges have been dropped. This removal is not, in my view, required by any policy (including WP:BLP), but I think it a sensible thing to do to protect this young man's reputation. Posting here in case anyone disagrees or has any comments. --Mkativerata (talk) 21:35, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
- I think it should stay - while i understand that it would protect his reputation (and inevitable vandalism of this page) the incident did affect his career - a 3 and half month ban from Sydney FC and the young Socceroos. It should stay - however make it clear that the charges have been dropped by the DPP and that he has moved on from the incident. Nath1991 (talk) 01:31, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
- One alternative I was thinking of is instead of a separate section in bright lights, have a mere sentence or two that briefly mentions he was charged with a criminal offence that caused him to be suspended from football for a period of time, and that the charges were later dropped? I agree that the charges causing the suspension affects his footballing career so perhaps that softer form of inclusion might be appropriate? --Mkativerata (talk) 01:35, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
- If it was a minor criminal charge i think a couple of sentances would be appropiate, however since this is a major criminal charge, and it did affect his career in a large and significant way, it should have it's own section. Nath1991 (talk) 01:53, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
- One alternative I was thinking of is instead of a separate section in bright lights, have a mere sentence or two that briefly mentions he was charged with a criminal offence that caused him to be suspended from football for a period of time, and that the charges were later dropped? I agree that the charges causing the suspension affects his footballing career so perhaps that softer form of inclusion might be appropriate? --Mkativerata (talk) 01:35, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Sebastian Ryall. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090517003107/http://www.news.com.au:80/adelaidenow/story/0,22606,25487421-5006301,00.html to http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/story/0,22606,25487421-5006301,00.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090518135946/http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au:80/story/0,25197,25487489-5003460,00.html to http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,25487489-5003460,00.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:36, 21 January 2016 (UTC)