Advertising

edit

We have the interesting suggestion regarding this article to "Please help improve it by removing promotional content and inappropriate external links, and by adding encyclopedic content written from a neutral point of view. (October 2016)". A certain The Groundhogs album comes to mind, since there is no promotional content, and it has only encyclopedic content from a neutral point of view, and there's no indication why the currently single external link would be inappropriate. I expect that, quite the opposite, the article is considered insufficient exactly because it does not include more than the neutral point of view sourced material, as that currently makes it a rather dry description that doesn't give subjective pros and cons. Hence, I'll replace it with the stub template, inviting everyone to add subjective sourced information to make it less encyclopedic. Mysha (talk)