Talk:Seaham

This article is a mess

The article for Dawdon puts this Seaham article to shame. It is a total shambles. The worst point, for me, is the repeated assumption that Dawdon is part of Seaham. It isn't. It is an entity on its own. (Own history, own pit, own parish boundary.) Someone needs to clean this up - and remove all claims to Dawdon's history etc etc.

82.11.28.111 (talk) 18:56, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Seaham. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090808173135/http://www.seahammarina.co.uk/ to http://www.seahammarina.co.uk/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:42, 29 November 2017 (UTC)