Talk:Seafood Watch

Latest comment: 29 days ago by Kamrynkinsey in topic Wiki Education assignment: Sustainable Futures

Fair use rationale for Image:Australia's Sustainable Seafood Guide.jpg edit

 

Image:Australia's Sustainable Seafood Guide.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:14, 13 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

"Industry Criticism" edit

This section's paragraph is completely unsourced and is of dubious nature. Please clarify, provide quotes and citations. I've indicated some of the problem areas:

In December 2008, the British Columbia Salmon Farmers Association published a letter from executive director, Mary Ellen Walling to Geoff Shester, the former Senior Science Manager of Monterey Bay Aquarium's sustainable seafood initiative.[citation needed] Walling outlined several concerns[specify] about Seafood Watch's methods, specifically questioning the red list designation of farmed Atlantic salmon when British Columbia-based farms shared so many of the same methods[vague] with those used in Alaska to produce ranched salmon. Walling also contended[original research?] that Monterey Bay's Report on farmed Atlantic salmon was woefully out of date[further explanation needed] and that Monterey Bay needed to demonstrate greater transparency in its review process[further explanation needed] in order to continue to be considered credible[dubious ] by industry.

Safety Cap (talk) 14:20, 11 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Book chapter edit

Seafood Ecolabelling: Principles and Practice is a possible reference for this article, starting on page 341. Rhinopias (talk) 21:58, 28 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Assessment for B-class criteria edit

Overall, a good article, but needs more citations/references, and the main body could use with splitting up into different sections, especially the last paragraph in the "Sustainable seafood list" section. It looks like this should have its own section. Overall, well-written with good supporting materials. - OliverEastwood (talk) 10:53, 15 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education assignment: Sustainable Futures edit

  This article is currently the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 January 2024 and 10 May 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kaoalyson (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Kamrynkinsey.

— Assignment last updated by Kamrynkinsey (talk) 21:42, 8 April 2024 (UTC)Reply