Talk:Sea Eagle (missile)

Latest comment: 7 years ago by 50.157.255.184 in topic Comparable missiles

Comparable missiles

edit

Quote of Dave1185 "we don't do comparison here on Wikipedia lest we risk becoming a bazaar for arms dealer to compare their goods :)"

I agree that wikipedia should NOT be a barter-place for haggling arms-manufacturers, however I do feel that linking to weapons of similar generations/capabilities does benefit the reader in search of information, especially the ones who is not an expert. /BP 78.70.77.35 (talk) 02:11, 29 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Constructive criticism: This article contains way too much information. No missile (many superior to this particular entry), contain as many words! Who cares about the minutia concerning the gestation of this particular missile? It is a very long and boring article. Why? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.157.255.184 (talk) 23:29, 14 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Sea Eagle Missile Status

edit

Ok - the Operators section lists nations and aircraft known to be capable to carry the missile. For the UK all aircraft listed are marked as retired aircraft.So what is the missile status with the UK MoD? Same Comment to Saudi Arabia. Users/ status of missile in previous sections fails to mention this. Is the UK or Saudi Arabia making integration efforts for missile to go onto newer Aircraft. Wfoj3 (talk) 14:46, 12 January 2014 (UTC)Reply