Talk:Scottish colonization of the Americas
This article is written in British English with Oxford spelling (colour, realize, organization, analyse; note that -ize is used instead of -ise) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Scottish colonies - did they exist?
editPrior to 1707 the Colonies were all subject to the Parliament of England. Under the Navigation Acts this meant that Scotland and Ireland, although subject to the same crown, were, for the purposes of trade, treated as foreign powers, and thus exluded from direct commercial contact with England's overseas possessions, a practice that was only ended in the case of Scotland with the 1707 Act of Union. However, after the Union of the Crowns in 1603, the Scots had protection of the law in all areas subject to the crown, which meant that they could settle in England, Wales, Virginia, the Carolinas, or wherever they were inclined to go. I suppose you could use the term Scots or British to describe the settlers in America. There was certainly a notion of Britishness after 1603, and James VI and I liked to style himself as 'King of Great Britain', though legally speaking no such entity existed. By the middle of the seventeenth century, moreover, the Protestant settlers in the north of Ireland were almost always referred to as British. Clio the Muse 08:39, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
Assessment
editI have assessed this as Start Class, as it only contains a fair amount of detail and organization, but is completely unreferenced. I have assessed this as low importance, as it is a highly specific topic within Canada. Cheers, CP 17:25, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
Map request
editThis article needs a map, similar to the maps included in most "Colonization of the Americas" articles. --CPAScott (talk) 16:25, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
- Agreed. Especially of the 17th and 18th century context around Nova Scotia, Cape Breton, East New Jersey and Stuarts Town. I have tagged the article reqmap. N2e (talk) 13:34, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Scottish colonization of the Americas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120126105335/http://www.nj.gov/state/darm/pdf/proprietors.pdf to http://www.nj.gov/state/darm/pdf/proprietors.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:50, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Bad Map
editAn original map was made for this article which wrongly depicts Nova Scotia's borders. The Scottish colony that existed in the 17th century did not have the same borders as the province currently has. Please do not add it back without fixing the problems and citing sources. From WP:OR#Original_images, "Original images created by a Wikipedian are not considered original research, so long as they do not illustrate or introduce unpublished ideas or arguments, the core reason behind the "No original research" policy". There needs to be a source for the borders shown in the image and once that is consulted, you will find that the borders shown in that map are wrong. Rectipaedia (talk) 02:31, 21 March 2021 (UTC)