Talk:Scottish Aviation Bulldog

Service ceiling

edit

Under "Performance" a service ceiling of only 10 000 feet is given. Where does that statement come from? I still have my Pilot Manual (SFI SK 61) from when I flew it in the Swedish Air Force, and there is nothing in there showing that this airplane have much lower performance and service ceiling than even a Cessna 172! The fact that other rules about oxygen requirement may restrict operation to some is not the same as a service ceiling by performance! No service ceiling is given in my manual, and we never had any reason to really test the limit, but I will remove 10 000 feet and leave it blank untill someone find a more realistic number!--Towpilot 07:05, 19 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

I corrected the info to 17000 ft (5182 m). --MoRsE 07:28, 19 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
Sounds much more realistic, but exactly 17 000 ft is obviously a little bit generic, therefore the numbers in meter should be rounded as well to 5 000! Also, since all other metric info is given as alternative, these numbers should be swaped. Or the other way around. BTW, where did you find it?--Towpilot 07:55, 19 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
From this web page. It seems at least trustworthy. --MoRsE 09:27, 19 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Primary user

edit

With only five aircraft per the Variants-section, it seems odd that Malta is the primary user. Is that due to the aircraft being retired with the previous operators? BP OMowe (talk) 23:21, 29 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Scottish Aviation Bulldog. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:19, 10 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:36, 27 August 2018 (UTC)Reply