Talk:Scott catalogue

Philately High‑importance

	Philately portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philately, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of philately and stamp collecting on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhilatelyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilatelyTemplate:WikiProject PhilatelyPhilately articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Reference works (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Reference works, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Reference worksWikipedia:WikiProject Reference worksTemplate:WikiProject Reference worksReference works articles

Possible error re: Scott-Krause lawsuit? edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

In the Background section, the article says "The inconsistency with which Scott enforced these licences resulted in a lawsuit by Krause Publications (publishers of the Minkus Catalogue) for copyright infringement.", but my understanding is that Scott sued Krause, in which case surely it should be "… a lawsuit against Krause …"? [Same issue on Stamp_numbering_system.]

Furthermore, the cited reference no longer seems available; on Stamp_numbering_system an Internet Archive(d) copy is cited instead.

dib492 (talk) 18:48, 30 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Sale of Dr. Meng's Colletion edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I don't have the references because the information is privte; however, the bulk (if not the entiret) of the Meng collection was purchased by Davitt Felder through Harmer Schau auctions in 2011, and sold through RubyStamps.com auction website. IcehouseCover (talk) 19:45, 12 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Add topic