 | This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Mentions
editPlease see MOS:DABMENTION for the inclusion of red links on disambiguation pages, and WP:BRD for discussing reversions. -- JHunterJ (talk) 18:57, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but being guest of honor at Ropecon is not sufficient. The redlink rule is for people who could have an article. You will note I left the Olympic gymnast gold medal winner. In any case, worrying about whether one can be looked up on Wikipedia is silly. Abductive (reasoning) 21:36, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but being mentioned on Wikipedia is sufficient. Since the article uses the red link, the disambiguation page does as well. If you feel the red links are inappropriate, please remove them from the articles linked. If you feel the mentions are unencyclopedic, please remove them from the articles linked. Until then, please leave the entries for the ambiguous-on-Wikipedia-topics on the Wikipedia disambiguation page. -- JHunterJ (talk) 23:03, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
- I fell the entry should be included, and it currently does comply with the manual of style. I wouldn't change anything. Ego White Tray (talk) 03:37, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
- Agreed, the entries do meet the criteria for inclusion at MOS:DABMENTION. older ≠ wiser 17:38, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but being mentioned on Wikipedia is sufficient. Since the article uses the red link, the disambiguation page does as well. If you feel the red links are inappropriate, please remove them from the articles linked. If you feel the mentions are unencyclopedic, please remove them from the articles linked. Until then, please leave the entries for the ambiguous-on-Wikipedia-topics on the Wikipedia disambiguation page. -- JHunterJ (talk) 23:03, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
I have restored the links again as per consensus on this page and MOS:DAB guidelines. Tassedethe (talk) 04:20, 15 May 2013 (UTC)