Talk:Scots College, Wellington

Fair use rationale for Image:Header-scotslogo.gif

Image:Header-scotslogo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 23:50, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Scots College, Wellington. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20150114035239/http://www.pco.parliament.govt.nz/assets/Uploads/pdf/2012report.pdf to http://pco.parliament.govt.nz/assets/Uploads/pdf/2012report.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:13, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Removal of controversies edit

The now deleted user 'Rebecca Burton at Scots College' deleted the Controversies section of this article. Not very clever... I'm putting the section back in and expanding it. Socrates420 (talk) 03:13, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Minor edit to notable alumni section

I noticed a recent edit by an IP had been rolled back by @Daniel Quinlan - I assume a case of something being mistaken for vandalism? The edit was to add an en-dash to one of the list entries to conform with the style of the rest of the list, seems clearly correct to me. I decided to be bold and add it back myself, sorry if I'm wrong and there's a substantive objection to this - please let me know if so! GeorgmentO (talk) 00:27, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

That's fine. If I reverted an edit from an IP, it was likely a mass-reversion of edits from a problematic editor. Sometimes, some of the edits are okay. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:54, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

Yeah, that's what it was. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:21, 11 September 2023 (UTC)